Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 5 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
Arguments: | 5 |
Debates: | 0 |
If you were to take out GMO's you would lose a lot of farm land because thats all some people grow because the origial crop has been lost and it would cause a lot of jobs to be lost
If they affects are bad then why does Europe have a higher cancer rate but don't have GMOs? And there is no proven prof that they are worse for us than Organic foods
Then how would the 7 billion people and growing on this earth be fed. It takes much more time to grow non GMOd food and it is not pest resistant and does not have high yields
I dont think they should ban them but they should label them so people know what they are eating.
I dont think they should ban them but they should label them so people know what they are eating.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |