Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 0 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
there is no proof for any health risks created by gmo foods.
what they didnt say is that everyone is at risk of contracting diseases from any animals not just those in factory farms. if GMOs were banned the risk of diseases would have no change
so you are saying that the production of more food at a lower price and available to more people, causing easier ways for the lower income and hungry people should be banned for the sake that everybody is forced to buy higher priced food which is still available for the people who can afford it.
There are no inherent differences between foods produced from genetically modified foods. By moving a piece of DNA from one organism into another, scientists are not introducing a "new" product. The new product just creates an organism with a desired trait. the companies who wish to produce GMO's test the safety of the new organism before ever releasing it to the public. If the product is made from an organism that has known allergen, it must be tested for safety. No one has substantiated a single human death, or even illness, as a result of consuming GM foods.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |