Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Sofiaspruill
| Reward Points: | 4 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 83% |
| Arguments: | 4 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
GMO products also require much more pesticides and insecticides than an organic crop. You are increasing the amounts of toxins and chemicals in your body immensely. If you wouldn't drink from a bottle of herbicide -which is in fact highly toxic- why would you want enormous amounts of it in your food supply? The increased amounts of these toxins can only lead to significant health problems for the future generations.
GMOs have no genetic diversity. In the same way that a pure-bred dog (which lacks in genetic diversity) has many more health problems than a good old mutt (containing high genetic diversity). GMO foods are much more susceptible to diseases and issues than an organic, unmodified food.
I believe GMOs should definitely be banned. If GMOs weren't bad for us, as so many companies want us to believe, why would they not be proud to package products as GMOs? Why would they be so sneaky about what they are selling to us for us to put in our family's bodies?
I believe GMOs should definitely be banned. If GMOs weren't bad for us, as so many companies want us to believe, why would they not be proud to package products as GMOs? Why would they be so sneaky about what they are selling to us for us to put in our family's bodies?
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
